What is justice?
There are many definitions for this term; it is highly
polemic, because what is just for some people won’t be fair for others. So the question I want to answer to start
this blog is; a how fair is social justice, without being biased?
Social Justice is a
state or doctrine of egalitarianism (Equality)
The fair and proper administration of laws conforming to the natural
law that all persons, irrespective of ethnic
origin, gender, possessions, race, religion, etc., are to be treated equally and without
prejudice. See also civil
rights.
Social Justice is extremely important, but in my
personal opinion still is a utopia.
Companies are more aware of this issue nowadays and are
trying hard to be equal, fair and promote equality. They claim to be Work place Diversity oriented and they
state that there is not discrimination of any kind. What happens in real life
is that when they realize that their company is compose in the majority for
white people, they start looking for people from different races (minorities)
to fill their spots.
The truth is that they create a smokescreen to cover
their lack of diversity and avoid problems. It is the same vicious circle, now
they don’t care if the new applicants are skilled; they just look for a
different person to fill their “Minority space”
Another issue worth talking is the “influences or
recommendations”. Companies’ claims that this is over, and they will select the
best candidate. However, this is not true, never have been and probably never
will. Particularly talking about private
companies.
In my personal
experience, I remember that at my work, a commercial director position was
opened. There were two natural candidates (brand managers) that had developed
an excellent work in the past. The board decided to have a third candidate (external).
The 3 candidates went through the process and at the end the external candidate
won the position, regardless the expertise and knowledge of the 2 other
managers.
The new commercial
director took her new position, after some time we realized that was one of the
best friends of CMO. Time is wise and demonstrated that this was a totally
biased decision. Her lack of management skills, absence of experience and
stubbornness, plunged the whole department. This was a really bad decision and
she was relocated from her position after a year of work.
I think we all are
a little biased, sometimes is not because we want, it is because what we have
learned and how the system has shaped us. At the same time, we like to use our
influences to get a better job. We find the ways to get related to influential
people to achieve our personal goals.
It is highly important to be aware of this,
and when the time comes to be in charge, try to leave apart relations,
friendship, so we could choose wisely without being biased. One more thing,
always give credit to the people that deserve it, this will drive you to an stability
and will help to move forward the whole team.
Great blog Alejandro! I like that you are ahead of the class on subject matter but found a way to share a personal experience where bias contradicted the stated goals of an organization --to be fair and socially just. Corporate world has a LONG way to go to truly be a fair and equitable place for all. But that's why leadership skills and self-awareness/EQ are so important in today's world. It's really no longer acceptable -- nor competitively advantageous -- to just follow the old patterns of patriarchy and paternalism/nepotism (hiring your pals!). Fortunately, some companies and some CEO/C-suite leaders are waking up and stepping up -- to a new way of leading.
ReplyDeleteGood work...would love to hear you dig a bit deeper into what KINDS of bias are at play in these situations: group think, affect heuristic, risk aversion, etc...
Prof J